• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Philadelphia Wealth & Asset Management Firm

wealth management

  • Why TBA?
    • Why Tower Bridge Advisors?
    • FAQs
  • Who We Serve
    • Individuals & Families
    • Financial Advisors
    • Institutions & Consultants
  • People
    • James M. Meyer, CFA® – CEO
    • Robert T. Whalen – Principal
    • Nicholas R. Filippo – VP, Sales & Marketing
    • Jeffrey Kachel – CFO, Principal & CTO
    • Chad M. Imgrund – Sr. Research Analyst
    • Christopher E. Gildea – Senior Portfolio Manager, Co-Chief Investment Officer
    • Daniel P. Rodan – Sr. Portfolio Mgr.
    • Christopher M. Crooks, CFA®, CFP® – Senior Portfolio Manager, Co-Chief Investment Officer
    • Michael J. Adams – Sr. Portfolio Manager
    • Shawn M. Gallagher, CFA® – Sr. Portfolio Mgr.
  • Wealth Management
    • How to Select the Best Wealth Management Firms
  • Process
    • Financial Planning
    • Process – Equities
    • Process – Fixed Income
  • Client Service
  • News
    • Market Commentary
  • Video
    • Economic Updates
  • Contact
    • Become A TBA Advisor
    • Ask a Financial Question
  • We are looking to add advisors to our team. Click here to learn more!
  • We are looking to add advisors to our team. Click here to learn more!
  • Click to Call: 610.260.2200
  • Send A Message
  • Why TBA?
    • Why Tower Bridge Advisors?
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Individuals & Families
    • Financial Advisors
    • Institutions & Consultants
  • People
    • James M. Meyer, CFA – Principal & CIO
    • Raymond F. Reed, CFA – Principal
    • Robert T. Whalen – Principal
    • Nicholas R. Filippo – VP, Sales & Marketing
    • Jeffrey Kachel – CFO, Principal & CTO
    • Chad M. Imgrund – Sr. Research Analyst
    • Christopher E. Gildea – Sr. Portfolio Mgr.
    • Daniel P. Rodan – Sr. Portfolio Mgr.
  • Wealth Management
  • Our Process
    • Financial Planning
    • Process: Equities
    • Process – Fixed Income
  • Client Service
  • News
    • News & Resources
    • Market Commentary
  • Videos
    • Economic Updates
  • Contact
    • Become a TBA Advisor
    • Ask a Financial Question
wealth management

May 12, 2025 – China and the United States have agreed to reduce tariff rates on each other by 115% leaving our tariff rate on Chinese goods at 30%. Since shortly after the shock of Liberation Day that sent equity investors into panic mode, there has been a gradual retreat from an overbearing tariff framework outlined that day. Today’s suspension of tariffs, pending further negotiations may not be a final step. But it comes right out of the Trump playbook that shoots for the moon first and then settles into a much more compromised reality later. While tariff negotiations continue not only with China but the rest of the world, investors can now focus on the next leg of the Trump agenda, tax cuts.

//  by Tower Bridge Advisors

Fears of excessive tariffs peaked on Liberation Day in early April. Financial markets cratered based both on the excessiveness of the announced levies in addition to the irrational nature of the process to determine payments each country would make. That included a tariff on an unoccupied island, at least uninhabited by people. The economic pain to the penguins would have been unbearable!

For the last five weeks, the administration has stepped back in stages. First the so-called reciprocal tariffs were suspended, at least until July with the notable exception of China where tariffs were increased to an unbearable 145%. Trade between the two nations seemingly ground to a halt. But negotiations over the weekend essentially eradicated most of the tariff pain and restored, at least temporarily, normalized trade between the two nations. While there may be a modest economic hit to GDP for both nations until goods start flowing again in each direction, clearly any thought of separating the two nations economically would have been disastrous. One can’t unwind four decades of economic interdependence with a simple Executive Order setting huge barrier walls in place without catastrophic damage. While few expected 145% tariffs to remain in place very long, a retreat all the way to 30% was beyond expectations. Hence the 2%+ rally likely this morning.

The 30% tariff may not be the end point. China has abused the notion of trade equality since it entered the WTO three decades ago. Negotiations will focus beyond simply finding a correct tariff rate. China must stop dumping excess production on world markets below cost. It must respect intellectual property. It must allow foreign businesses greater access to its own markets. In short, if China wants to compete and become a greater economic power, it must do so by the same set of rules as the rest of the developed world. No one is naïve enough to suggest that all China’s wrongs will be corrected in a matter of days or weeks. Negotiations that began late last week are only a first step forward. Final agreements will take months, if not years.

China now has a choice. It can continue to operate by its own rules that have given it unfair advantages for years. That choice may help growth near term but it doesn’t create binding relationships. Only a few allies like Russia and North Korea would consider the renminbi to be used as a currency for trade. The alternative, a revised set of trade rules, first between China and the U.S., and then with the rest of the world, has the opportunity to further establish China as a leading economic power. No one doubts today that China is a great economic power. It produces more goods than the United States, Germany and Japan combined. It can’t consume all it produces and therefore supports its economy by selling the rest throughout the world. Now, led by the United States, selling those goods worldwide must be done fairly.

As noted, over the last several decades China has become a manufacturing powerhouse. But it wants more. Its goal is to be the most advanced economy in the world and profit by the superiority it might be able to achieve. It has built an education infrastructure that rivals the rest of the world, producing far more STEM graduates that any other nation. It subsidizes and incentivizes businesses in strategic areas like artificial intelligence, drug development, and military weapons systems. Its electric grid today is far more robust than ours and capacity is growing at a much faster rate. DeepSeek’s emergence as a major large language model, despite restrictions the U.S. has place on exports of high-tech semiconductors and related manufacturing equipment, shows convincingly that artificial barriers alone won’t stop Chinese progress. As we noted just last week, our future economic success will depend on a public/private partnership to support and accelerate the United States’ own development in the key arenas that China is focused upon. Any restrictions limiting the ability of Nvidia# to stay in front as the leading producer of key semiconductors and systems are counterproductive. Instead, the focus should be on providing proper incentives that the best technology, including as much of the supply chain as possible, be reshored to the U.S. What applies to semis also applies to drug development, electrical equipment, drones and other advanced weapons systems, and energy independence. Not only must incentives be created to achieve that goal, barriers have to be torn town. Specifically, our bureaucracy has to be torn apart and no longer stifle the building of required infrastructure. Rome wasn’t built in a day and Congress acts slowly. In fact, it only acts quickly at a time of crisis. With that said, the emergence of DeepSeek and other Chinese companies leading first to a competitive equality but perhaps on the way to economic superiority, and the dominance China has already established in the electric car business, are clear warning signs that must be heeded. They are heard within the Trump administration. Congress has to see the warning signs as well.

Wall Street is celebrating because all the ruckus of the past three months has set the stage for an economic transformation. But setting the stage isn’t the same as making any transformation happen. Both China and the U.S. see disruptive economic change coming. Each follows a different approach. China’s economy is state run and state led. President Xi is the de facto head of every major Chinese company. In China’s rush to become an economic power, state led decisions have advanced the nation at a breakneck pace. But all decisions haven’t been the right ones. It fostered vast overbuilding of real estate. The bursting of that bubble has resulted in huge economic losses and made cautious Chinese consumers even more cautious. Deviating from state-imposed rules stifles entrepreneurial spirits. Perhaps central planning’s main advantage is speed. A Chinese road gets built in months, not years or even decades. Environmental issues get dealt with after the fact.

With that said, the U.S. has its own set of advantages. Our free enterprise model has given birth to the computer age, commercial aviation, semiconductor development and a majority of the most effective drugs in the world. As a result, we are the richest nation by far. As our nation has demonstrated repeatedly, our private enterprise system is a far better allocator of capital than the federal government. It also invites much less corruption than a state-controlled economy.

Thus, what’s happening today in Geneva sets the stage for a new framework that will guide economic development worldwide for many years to come. A book written almost 30 years ago by Adam Brandenburger and Barry Nalebuff entitled “Co-opetition” described a world where competitors often cooperate for common good aside from the direct competition for supremacy. Look at auto malls as a perfect example. If you want to buy a car, it’s convenient that all the car dealers are centrally located. That’s the cooperative part. Who sells you the car is the competitive part. Donald Trump has always looked at the world in competitive economic terms. Why don’t I sell you more goods than I buy from you? I win; you lose. Sometimes that’s right. I want to sell you that car, not the dealer next store. But how do I do that? By offering the best car and the best economic value on the automall.

The goal must be to elevate the U.S. above everyone else via a framework that focuses on developing tomorrow’s best products in all the key areas. Who cares where the tee shirt is made. We all have finite resources. Being the best technologically in all ways should be our nation’s imperative. In the 1980s and 90s, Toyota proved that it made the best mainstream cars. That fact elevated our Big 3 to build better automobiles. They reclaimed partial leadership (e.g. trucks and SUVs) but never returned to dominance. On the other hand, in the 1980s, Japan dominated semiconductor manufacturing. But over time companies like Intel, Texas Instruments and later Nvidia found new markets which each could dominate. The biotech revolution gave us names like Genentech and Amgen.

Today presents the opportunity. Wall Street is optimistic. Hopefully, Wall Street is right. Let me end with one final point. Intel created the microprocessor and had a multi-decade run as a dominant manufacturer of semiconductors. But the real giant turned out to be Microsoft# which built upon the power of the microprocessor to develop software that became the foundation for so much of what we do today. And Apple# used semiconductor technology to create a whole new world centered on the iPhone. The Mag 7 are today’s Intel. They are building the infrastructure for all kinds of new intelligence-related uses we can’t even contemplate at the moment. The important point is that we, meaning the whole world, are at the cusp of a new revolution. The winners will be vast. Some are currently building the infrastructure. Some are using that infrastructure to build applications (or agents using today’s parlance) to better accomplish specific tasks. Some not yet public or even born will emerge as the next Apple or Microsoft. But disruptive change also fills graveyards. Companies focused on protecting the past will lose. Some simply won’t be able to afford to pivot as necessary. Tomorrow’s winners and losers have yet to be determined. It is our job to define both.

Local golfer Jim Furyk is 56 today. I don’t normally mention fictional birthdays but Homer Simpson is 70 today.

James M. Meyer, CFA 610-260-2220

Tower Bridge Advisors manages over $1.3 Billion for individuals, families and select institutions with $1 Million or more of investable assets. We build portfolios of individual securities customized for each client's specific goals and objectives. Contact Nick Filippo (610-260-2222, nfilippo@towerbridgeadvisors.com) to learn more or to set up a complimentary portfolio review.

# – This security is owned by the author of this report or accounts under his management at Tower Bridge Advisors.

Additional information on companies in this report is available on request. This report is not a complete analysis of every material fact representing company, industry or security mentioned herein. This firm or its officers, stockholders, employees and clients, in the normal course of business, may have or acquire a position including options, if any, in the securities mentioned. This communication shall not be deemed to constitute an offer, or solicitation on our part with respect to the sale or purchase of any securities. The information above has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not necessarily complete and is not guaranteed. This report is prepared for general information only. It does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or the particular needs of any specific person who may receive this report. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies discussed in this report and should understand that statements regarding future prospects may not be realized. Opinions are subject to change without notice.

Filed Under: Market Commentary

Previous Post: « May 8, 2025 – The Federal Reserve on Wednesday held its key interest rate unchanged in a range between 4.25%-4.5% as it awaits better clarity on trade policy and the direction of the economy. While uncertainty about the economic outlook has increased further, the Fed is taking a wait and see stance toward future monetary policy. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 Index has just about fully recovered its losses following the April 2nd “Liberation Day” when major tariffs were announced on U.S. trading partners. The bounce in risk assets is welcome, but we are still looking for white smoke signals showing that progress on inflation and tariffs is being made.
Next Post: May 15, 2025 – Following a big rebound, the S&P 500 is flat YTD but trades at a high valuation of 23x forward earnings. Consumer spending faces headwinds from rising student loan defaults and a cooling housing market. While recession fears have eased, the economy is slowing and inflation trends remain uncertain. »

Primary Sidebar

Market Commentary

Sign Me Up!

Latest News

  • June 30, 2025 – Trump’s big beautiful bill is headed for the finish line. It isn’t done yet and likely will see further changes before it reaches his desk. As the administration buys the votes necessary for its approval, expect the impact on future deficits to rise. With that said, the bill will help to accelerate near-term growth. Second quarter earnings reports are just a couple of weeks away and they should be good. However, unlike Q1 when skepticism abounded, this time optimism is high. July is usually a good month for stocks but the sharp April-June rally may mute the pace of further gains.
  • June 26, 2025 – Labubu dolls are hard to get these days. These dolls are prized by children in China, along with some celebrity admirers such as David Beckham and Rihanna. The grimacing, elvish-looking creatures come in “blind boxes” that keep buyers in suspense over which one they might get, but can take weeks to acquire. They sell for as little as $20, but a rare variety recently sold at auction for $150,000. In spite of all the hand-wringing about inflation and tariffs, consumers around the globe continue to spend. However, patterns of spending have definitely shifted.
  • June 23, 2025 – Saturday’s bombing of Iran’s nuclear sites was shocking news but financial markets are taking the news in stride at least until they can assess the Iranian response. Economically, little has changed so far. The one elevated risk would be an attempted blockage of the Strait of Hormuz. While possible, that would be a very dangerous escalation that would evoke a powerful response. Markets, at least for now, place low odds of that happening. Thus, the economic impact of the raid so far is marginal and markets remain calm.
  • June 16, 2025 – While many in Congress fret that the reconciliation bill now before the Senate raises deficits and ultimately leads to economic disaster if left unchecked in the future, the focus will be on now. That means lower taxes, faster growth and higher earnings in the short-run as long as the bond market doesn’t rebel. Only a true crisis is likely to elicit fiscal austerity. That won’t happen before the current bill, slightly modified, will pass. Wall Street will embrace it because it always embraces stimulative policy, at least until the side effects kick in. Markets are starting to replace complacency with euphoria. That can last many months. But as we learned from the SPAC debacle in 2021, it won’t last forever.
  • June 12, 2025 – Despite a resilient stock market grinding near all-time highs, a fresh wave of geopolitical risk and fiscal policy uncertainty is creating headwinds. A chorus of Wall Street’s most respected investors is sounding the alarm, warning of dangerously high valuations, an unsustainable U.S. debt burden, and the rising probability of an economic slowdown.
  • June 9, 2025 – This week the focus will be on trade negotiations with China and the progress getting the Big Beautiful Bill on the President’s desk. The former is likely to be complicated and slow moving, but any movement in the right direction should keep investors happy. As for the legislation, it will be inflationary and worrisome long-term if one focuses on future debt service requirements. But this market has heard wolf cried too often to care until either interest rates spike higher or the dollar comes under renewed attack.
  • June 5, 2025 – The Old Faithful Geyser in Yellowstone National Park erupts regularly, but not on an exact schedule. Considering the most recent 100 eruptions, the average time between eruptions ranged from 55 minutes to over 2 hours. Likewise, inflation and employment data can cause ebbs and flows in the bond market, creating volatility for investors. Economic data are currently coming in mixed, mostly related to changing tariff policy. Meanwhile, equity markets are slightly positive so far this year, and only off about 3% from all-time highs.
  • June 2, 2025 – Just as the Soviets laid down the gauntlet in the 1960s starting the space race, China has caught up to us technologically in many ways and is still gaining ground in others. For the U.S. to maintain its leadership requires coordinated efforts from both the private and public sectors. Trying to erect barriers is not a winning formula. Rather, properly focusing resources to support the most strategic initiatives makes sense.
  • May 30, 2025 – Amidst a volatile market, significant economic risks such as high interest rates and trade policy are creating a tense environment where stock market gains may be capped. Key sectors, like housing, are already showing signs of strain from elevated rates, while the bond market remains turbulent. Therefore, a diversified and defensive investment strategy is recommended, emphasizing fundamental analysis and valuation discipline for stocks while holding high-quality bonds to navigate the expected volatility.
  • May 27, 2025 – The House has passed Trump’s big beautiful bill and moved it on to the Senate. It’s a budget buster that offers something for all but will expand deficits meaningfully. It’s a bit of a mess that can be fixed if the Senate has the backbone to fix it. Wall Street will be watching, especially bond investors.

Footer

Wealth Management Services

  • Individuals & Families
  • Financial Advisors
  • Institutions & Consultants

Important Links

  • ADV Part 2 & CRS
  • Privacy Policy

Tower Bridge Advisors, a Philadelphia Wealth and Asset Management firm, is registered with the SEC as a Registered Investment Advisor.

Portfolio Review

Is your portfolio constructed to meet your current and future needs? Contact us today to set up a complimentary portfolio review, using our sophisticated portfolio analysis system.

Contact

Copyright © 2023 Tower Bridge Advisors

Philadelphia Wealth & Asset Management, Registered Investment Advisors

300 Barr Harbor Drive
Suite 705
West Conshohocken, PA 19428

Phone: 610.260.2200
Toll Free: 866.959.2200

  • Why Tower Bridge Advisors?
  • Investment Services
  • Our Team
  • Wealth Management
  • Investment Process
  • Client Service
  • News
  • Market Commentary
  • Economic Update Videos
  • Contact